09 August 2009

I'm lost in the crowd and I'm hungry like the woooooolf...

A few things:

First, the issue of healthcare. I recently wrote a letter to my congressmen (plural) to illustrate how badly I think the healthcare reform bill is taking a beating due to misunderstanding of how the system will actually function. My letter is below:


Dear Mr. Dent,

Having read your editorial on the matter of health care, as a constituent of yours, I strongly urge you to reconsider or give the bill another chance. This health care reform bill may not be the best plan, but it represents more than what it entails: health care in this country has been run for far too long by insurance companies who are out to gain profits more than care about their patients. When health care becomes a capitalistic venture (which it has), everyone loses, especially patients. Having read article after article of patients being refused coverage for the most ridiculous reasons, this bill, despite its flaws, means that ordinary citizens are finally beginning to strike back against insurance companies, who hold too much of our lives and money in their hands and could care less about what happens to us. Passage of this bill shows something to the health care lobby and to big-business: caring for people should come BEFORE profit margins, not after. I note that the bill has flaws, but there is also a gross public misunderstanding about the nature of what public options entail that you should seek to rectify. In Europe, public options have been available for decades, and America remains the only first-world country to lack a public option. Would the world explode if America adopts one? Seeing as how Europeans are perfectly fine with theirs, I would say not. To address the issue, adopting a public option does in no way entail the death of private insurers. With a public option, those who NEED insurance can finally get some, considering the statistic that around 46 million Americans are uninsured. However, those with the financial means to acquire it can purchase their own private insurance. Private insurance will not die. It will remain available for those who choose to buy it or keep it, but the public option opens up availability to a lot more people in worse circumstances than those who can afford the premiums on health insurance. My father has worked a blue-collar job all of his life, and I've been lucky, as his job comes with health insurance. His deductible is $2000 and as hours are getting slashed, medical procedures that he needs for his eyesight are becoming extremely difficult for us to afford. They could be covered under insurance, but they're not. You see, each surgery rounds up to about $1,800 - a mere $200 from the deductible. As it doesn't meet it, the insurance company will not cop to co-pay. Working-class Americans NEED this bill and politicians like you NEED to make sure that other citizens understand what a public option really entails. The word "socialism" has been bandied about a LOT lately, but it's mostly to vilify Democrats and the administration, as well as intimidate those afraid of supporting it into a hardened "against" stance with a loud yell and deafness to opposing opinions. Public options can only seek to make the US a HEALTHIER place and a GOOD place. America advertises that it takes care of its people - well, we need to be taken care of, and our current health care system is not doing its job. Public options do not mean the death of private insurance companies - it just means they will be reaping a lot less money and will have to rely on actual HUMANITARIANISM and COMPASSION in order to continue holding current customers. This bill is not like long lines at the DMV; this bill is about the government serving its purpose and fulfilling its duty to the American people to ensure that companies do not benefit off of the breaking backs of working people. As a representative, please make sure that my voice, and the voices of those who agree with me, are not drowned out by the select few with bullhorns and closed minds. Public health insurance options are needed and we need to adopt this quickly. Health care reform has been a losing battle for years, if only because insurance companies can pony up money for hundreds of lobbyists and the US government can only do what it can. If this bill passes, it will represent another step in the process. Further revisions, further refining and retooling of how this system works - it will FORCE the insurance companies and those who are taking advantage of working-class people to take a look at their own policies and see what could happen if they stop treating people as capital and start treating them as people. THIS BILL REPRESENTS AN OPPORTUNITY TO FINALLY OFFER HEALTH CARE TO ALL THOSE WHO NEED IT. Killing this bill would mean pushing health care all the way to the bottom of the list of priorities when it's election season again; it means millions of Americans having to suffer to try and figure out how to pay medical bills, or what's worthy of a trip to the emergency room or not, while someone sits in a corner office and counts their billions of dollars. Passing this bill means a chance; killing it means another few years under a system that not only is inefficient and harms those it supposedly cares about, but unabashedly reaps profits from the backs of the people forced to its yoke. PLEASE support the health care reform bill and PLEASE support us.

Best,
Karen Chau


And second, remember my Twilight thing? I've begun rereading it and it's terrible:

Twilight tries too hard to be Jane Eyre. Like Jane, Bella swears on her plainness. Unlike Bella, though, Jane actually admits she has some good qualities, and unlike Bella, when her brooding potential love interest does something douchey (like try and marry her, despite being married to someone else), Jane does something proactive - she runs away. Bella sticks with Edward, regardless of his emotionally abusive and controlling behavior.

"Too scary for me?" I asked when I could control my voice again.

"If that were it, I would take you out tonight," he said, his voice cutting. "You need a healthy dose of fear. Nothing could be more beneficial for you."


That's an actual quote. A HEALTHY DOSE OF FEAR? WHAT THE FUCKITY FUCK, HOW DOES ANYONE THINK HE'S A ROMANTIC ANYTHING.

THE FACT THAT STEPHANIE MEYER THINKS THAT EDWARD CULLEN = EDWARD FERRARS + EDWARD ROCHESTER + A HANDFUL OF MR. DARCY IS SAD. EDWARD CULLEN =/= AWESOME CHARACTERS (MINUS PERHAPS ROCHESTER).

click to expose me!

30 June 2009

Before LGBTQ Pride Month ends, I would just like to address one common issue that people have with arguing against gay marriage. People who argue against gay marriage often cite the Founding Fathers and their inherent morality.

Meet Thomas Jefferson, motherfuckers.

"...that our civil rights have no dependence on our religious opinions, more than on ours in physic or geometry; that, therefore, the proscribing any citizen as unworthy the public confidence, by laying upon him an incapacity of being called to offices of trust and emolument (DADT), unless he profess or renounce this or that religious opinion, is depriving him injuriously of those privileges and advantages to which in common with his fellow-citizens he has a natural right (gay marriage and the idea of "faith" with politicians); tends also to corrupt the principles of that very religion it is meant to encourage, by bribing with a monopoly of worldly honors and emoluments those who will externally conform to it...; that is suffer the civil magistrate to intrude his powers into the field of opinion, and to restrain that profession or propagation of principles on supposition of their ill tendency, is a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty, because he, being of course judge of that tendency, will make his opinions the rule of judgment, and approve or condemn the sentiment of others, only as they shall agree with or differ from his own.


SO EVERYONE STFU ABOUT OUR LEADERS/POLITICIANS/WHOEVER NEEDING TO HAVE "FAITH" AND "MORALITY" AND HOW THE BIBLE SAYS GAY PEOPLE CAN'T GET MARRIED.

click to expose me!

16 June 2009

And Iran, Iran so far away, couldn't get away.

I'm going to make this short.

"Ahmadinejad called us dust; we showed him a sandstorm."

Twitter has brought out the most poetic things, poetic in its utter sadness. There is so much violence going on in Iran right now, so many people who are live-posting to the Western world their need for freedom, their acceptance of the fact that they are willing to die if it means a better life for another family member. This is INSANE.

But that's not what this post is about. This post is about who is reading those examples of courage. People in Iran are using illegal proxies (as the government has pretty much shut everything down) to twitter on their cell phones messages IN BETWEEN GUNSHOTS. IN. BETWEEN. GUNSHOTS. Can we in the United States truly grasp what that means? Students were hauled out of bed at 5 am and either detained, taken to prison, or killed. But they still keep fighting.

My whole problem is not what Iran and the people are sending, but how we, as young Americans, are receiving. The political apathy, the utter lack of awareness is startling. In example, I provide my Facebook page.



THE CMT AWARDS FUCKING MADE MY "FRIENDS'" NEWS FEED, BUT NOT THE IRANIAN REVOLUTION WHICH IS GOING ON, WHICH IS LEADING TO DEATHS AND WOUNDED AND PEOPLE BEING HAULED OFF BY SECRET POLICE IN PLAIN CLOTHING? THE COUNTRY MUSIC AWARDS? HONESTLY?

My outrage, let me show you it. Thank god for Twitter and for informed Americans because the power we exert? It is kind of mighty. Sure, it's not without its faults nor is it infallible, but the fact that Twitter got ahold of the story before CNN, continues to report on things worth more journalistically than CNN (who juxtaposed the story of the happenings in Iran with the election and, um, a cheeseburger in a can), and continues to try and influence the way mainstream media (or, as us in the know like to call it, MSM) with our own small presence.

Iran is about more than an election. It is about a nation trying to equate its people's wants with what the government refuses to give up. It's going to be struggle. It's already turned violent. It's already turned bloody. What's the least we could do? Pay them some fucking attention, maybe?

I leave you with this - one powerful picture and one powerful twitter. Do something with your American status. Twitter. INFORM PEOPLE. Don't just stand by quietly.



"NextRevolution: i realize now i do not fear death... i fear my daughter will not be free when i die #gr88 #IranElection #tehran"

Make a difference in someone's life. In a COUNTRY'S life.

click to expose me!

02 June 2009

Failboats.

Quick post to emphasize some of my points.

1. Gay marriage should be legalized or the government should gtfo of the issue.
2. I love capslock.

Initial post:


frank pravda
Tue Apr 28 2009 19:06
How do homosexuals multiply like rabbits without mating the same way. Homosexuals are all over the place in some states. On a bulletin board a female homo advertised that she was lonely and asked for advice about what to do about it. I advised her to obtain professional help for her affliction and soon she would have friends. It turned out that the operators of the board blocked me from the board, searched out where I sent my message from and sent a postal service letter there complaining about me as a person. So you can see what is down the road with what is going on. How about a marriage license for a cattleman who loves his horse - class MH marriage license. And one for the man who loves his lizzard - class ML marriage license. And for the homosexual babies a special stamp on their birth certificate to identify them. This can all come about with the kind of legislatures and governors we now have.


My response:

Frank,

Maybe the reason the board members turned you in was because you acted completely disrespectful about a person you didn't even know. The fact that you treated her so badly is just mind-boggling. The idea that she doesn't have friends because she's gay is preposterous. Just look at Guy A over there, he doesn't have friends because he doesn't like country music.

"So you can see what is down the road with what is going on. How about a marriage license for a cattleman who loves his horse - class MH marriage license. And one for the man who loves his lizzard - class ML marriage license. And for the homosexual babies a special stamp on their birth certificate to identify them. This can all come about with the kind of legislatures and governors we now have. "

What's down the road seems Orwellian to me. The government has no business getting into people's affairs (Fourth Amendment; Griswold v. Connecticut) and the idea of separation of church and state has been completely forgotten. Marriage is a LEGAL issue. Gay couples are not being LEGALLY recognized in the same ways straight couples are. The entire premise for rejecting gay marriage is because it violates someone's religion. SOMEONE'S. Not everyone's. We're singling out one type of religious belief to discriminate against an entire mass of people.

And just because gays can get married doesn't mean that people can marry their animals. First off, HUMAN RIGHTS, please learn what they are. Gay PEOPLE deserve to be treated LIKE PEOPLE and they should be allowed to have their own cultural traditions, get married, adopt children, etc. Just because YOUR RELIGION says that homosexuality isn't right doesn't mean that EVERYONE believes it, and EVERYONE having to subscribe to ONE idea is exactly what the Founding Fathers were fighting AGAINST (except in England, it was Puritans who were getting persecuted). Two gays getting married is no different than a white man marrying a black woman. Or, according to you, should that be illegal too?

People are just people. What does it matter to you if two people are happy? How does the HAPPINESS OF PEOPLE make you unhappy in ANY WAY? It's irrational and illogical. Once we start going down this route of "We can't allow gay marriage because the Bible says it's wrong...", the Bible also says that working on Sunday is wrong, that taking the Lord's name in vain is wrong, that POLYGAMY AND SLAVERY are fine.

You shouldn't get to pick and choose which parts of the Bible you're going to be fundamentalist about. If you're going to say you want people to adhere to the Bible, then fine. Women then should be considered property, rich, white males should be the only ones allowed to vote, and anyone who works on Sunday should be publicly executed.

THE QUESTION OF GAY MARRIAGE IS A QUESTION OF EQUALITY - NOTHING ELSE. Your churches don't have to marry gay couples if it pisses you off so much, but if other people want to PUBLICLY DECLARE THEIR LOVE, what does it matter to you?

click to expose me!

04 February 2009

You are officially ON NOTICE!

Having read the Burger King post of my comrade, I've decided to do one of my own. Not so much on the perfume, but on the sheer blatant imperialism that Burger King has decided to espouse. And beyond that, not even imperialism, but xenophobia. Fear of foreigners. Mockery of foreigners. Ladies and Gents, let me present to you The Whopper Virgin commercial.

What is the Whopper Virgin commercial? It's presented, first of all, as a documentary - one of perhaps anthropological origin - about cultures outside of the United States who seem particularly "uncivilized" and ohmyGOD they have never heard of a BURGER BEFORE! So the kind, non-bottom-line-motivated CEOs of Burger King decide to send a camera crew there, Whoppers, laden with trans fats and oils and hydrogenated oils and I'm sure processed lard, over there to feed them to the people who raise yaks and llamas and eat more roughage than they do meat. Is there something wrong with this? Burger King thinks so.

This is my problem. There is nothing wrong with a society that doesn't eat as much red meat as the United States. Don't get me wrong, I have no problem for red meat. Neither do I hate it. I rather hate the people, the scuppies of our generation [socially conscious yuppies], who pretend that by not eating meat or dairy or organic food, we are somehow killing ourselves and look at how much better than me they are. But the whole fact of a society that doesn't eat burgers? I'm fine with it. Burger King respectfully disagrees.

Look at all the unexploited potential, they say. Look at all the people we could make addicted to our food, they clamor. Think of all the CEOs crying in their poor cash-filled jacuzzis. I'm sorry, was that an oxymoron? There is just something so particularly distressing about this that it's unavoidable. The United States, to be frank, is one where the diet consists primarily of a meat dish with vegetable side dishes. As multiple gourmands have informed on Travel Channel specials, America is one of the few countries (if the only one) where people don't share a collective meat dish and munch on veggies.

Meat is a commodity. Burgers? Are so incredibly not. People have survived long enough on vegetables. And beyond that, there have been studies that show that fast food is addictive. And what we don't need is to make obesity the norm. We don't need to get the other 5 billion people in the world addicted to our bad foods in order to rake in the cash. There should be a new apocalypse theory called ShoeString: How McDonald's Will End the World and Eliminate the Human Species. Okay, okay, so maybe that's a little extreme, but still, has my point been pounded enough into your head yet?

The commercial itself leaves a lot to be desired in terms of imperialism too. "These people are Whopper Virgins. They've never had a burger, the most American of American foods. America! ...America!" What do they think, that if they shout patriotism long enough at us, we'll buy it and decide to annex Nepal or Yugoslavia?

Burger King: Home of The Whopper Pretentiousness.

click to expose me!

30 January 2009

BK cologne + sacrificial rituals?

Recent Burger King progressions into unconventionality have me worried.
Here, a delicious new product from Burger King, the home of the King of Whoppers.
and
There, an unconventional coupon offer from your friendly neighborhood King of the Burgers.

What are we coming to? We have too many casually "friend-ed" people on Facebook that Burger King was kind enough to take the time out to motivate us to clean up some of that Facebook clutter? Why Facebook? Why not MySpace, Burger King? Why not set your sacrificial rites on the terrible court jester of crap, Mr. MySpace? Alarming that so many people have sacrificed their Facebook buddies for a Whopper, but what's really alarming is the first link up there.

"Mmm. Burgers cooking on the grill smell so delicious! I want to smell like that too!" /spritz spritz.

Ahh, my world is perfect now. /woman bound to where I am and trail me like my scent trails



What?!

click to expose me!

20 January 2009

O B A M A

chyea, 44th United States of America President, Barack Obama!

/applause applause!

click to expose me!